![]() ![]() But if you see the video, the fighting woman can be interpreted as having an obession with the couple, more specifically the man. If you were only to hear the song without the visuals, a male vocalist sings about having an almost obsession with a woman. This clearly presents the scene in a different light, now with the man being the victim, and actually the fighting woman as the aggressor. The bound woman is then seen looking very distressed as she looks behind the man, at the angry woman, discreetly trying to advance towards the man with a knife in her hand. The man as well as the bound woman, carry weddings rings, so I strongly assume they're married.įurthermore, the bound woman seems very relieved by the man's arrival and he looks at her with concerned and soft eyes. Played forwards, we see a man arriving to what is assumed to be his home (as he seems very familiar with his surroundings) and finds what I assume to be his wife, bound and crying in the closet. If you watch the video played forwards, like it would happen in real life, it paints a whole other picture. What needs to be remembered is, that everything is played in reverse. When it's played backwards, the man in the video seems like the psychotic aggressor, killing the first woman with a Breezeblock, and taping the second womans mouth with duct tape, before leaving her crying in and bound in a closet. This fits in with the music video, but not played forwards,played backwards, like it originally does. That strongly implies that a male character restrains a female, not allowing HER to 'run away'. On the other hand, a male voice (Joe Newman) sings the first line "SHE may contain the urge to run away, but hold HER down with soggy clothes and breezeblocks." I feel like the lyrics make a whole lot more sense when you watch the video as well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |